Beta Testing In-House vs. Hiring an Outside Company

Your developers have been coding like crazy. The application is now in beta stage. You acknowledge that it must be tested, but decide that you can use one of your developers or project managers to do the job. Here at Beta Breakers, we wish we had a dime for every time a prospective customer told us that story.

Using in-house staff to test your software products is always sure to be fraught with disaster. Why? Read on to learn more.

In-House Staff Are Not Properly Trained

The most significant reason is that they simply are not trained software quality assurance people.  They likely do not possess the skills and experience of a real quality assurance person. Whereas they may discover some glaring issues, they are highly unlikely to uncover bugs that are less obvious. Unaccounted for, these bugs will certainly be encountered by your user base shortly after you go live.  Furthermore, untrained in-house staff will likely fail to properly document the details for the bugs they do happen to uncover.  Incomplete bug reporting tends to frustrate developers.

Familiarity Breeds Complacency

The other major shortcoming associated with using in-house staff lies in the idea that “familiarity breeds complacency”. Company personnel have likely seen your application many times. They are intimately familiar with its functionality. When these people test, they will naturally make assumptions regarding the application’s functionality. Objectivity therefore takes a back seat to the tendency to plow through the application as quickly as possible.

What Is the Solution?

You and your colleagues strive to release your application in perfect shape, so trust your product to actual quality assurance testers. At Beta Breakers, our QA methodologies have been honed to perfection. Our lab-based facilities are equipped to simulate marketplace conditions so that we may uncover platform-compatibility issues before you launch.

Sure, it may cost you a bit more money, but ask yourself, “How much does your company have invested in the application? How much do you stand to lose in credibility if you launch with bugs?”

The Beta Breakers team will help you find all of the bugs in your applications – allowing you to go live with total confidence. Contact us today to get started!

Written by Beta Breakers

Beta BreakersWith Experience in Quality Assurance & Testing Desktop Software, Mobile Apps, Websites & Web Applications for Nearly 30 Years, Beta Breakers has become the Premier Software Quality Assurance Labs and Application-Testing Provider - Learn More Here

Receive the latest blog posts from Beta Breakers directly in your inbox

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

4 Comments

  • Otis Livasy

    of course like your web site but you need to check the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very bothersome to inform the reality on the other hand I will surely come back again.

    Reply
  • Apellidos de Guinea Ecuatorial

    In this great scheme of things you receive an A+ for hard work. Where you actually lost us was on all the specifics. You know, they say, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn’t be more correct here. Having said that, permit me reveal to you precisely what did give good results. The article (parts of it) is actually quite persuasive and that is probably the reason why I am taking an effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, whilst I can certainly notice a jumps in reasoning you come up with, I am not really confident of how you seem to unite the details which inturn make the actual conclusion. For the moment I shall subscribe to your issue but trust in the near future you connect the facts much better.

    Reply